- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Hey Matt and Dave,
I was wondering with your tests we are trying to work out how fast and HR for an hour-long effort. Obviously, your current threshold tests don’t always work on the hour but an equation to work it out.
Would the best method be to do an hour test? (realise some people are time-poor)
I am trying to work out some threshold for some other sports too.
Cheers,
BenHi Ben,
Excellent question. The key difference between HR, on the one hand, and pace and power, on the other, is that HR is a physiological measure, whereas pace and power are performance measures. This difference becomes important when considering questions like the one you’ve asked. The 80/20 intensity zones are anchored to functional lactate threshold values for pace and power, which are indeed defined as the fastest pace/highest power an athlete can sustain for one hour. So, if your preferred intensity metric is either pace or power, it’s fine to use a one-hour time trial to determine this value.
With HR, though, not so much. If you do a one-hour time trial, you’ll find that your HR climbs throughout it. Sure, you can take your average and use it as an approximation of your LTHR, but how accurate is that, really? A physiological threshold is a pinpoint, not an average. So, if you’re going to train by HR, I’d rather see you determine your FTP, rFTP, and/or LTP and then find the HR that aligns with this value through separate testing.
Coach Matt
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.